MIB – 12KBW International & Travel Law Blog

This case comment is by Patrick Vincent of 12 King’s Bench Walk. The recent decision of the Supreme Court in Moreno has cleared up one – but only one – of the difficulties created by the complicated and fragmented way in which the legislature has attempted to implement the requirements of the EU Motor Insurance Directives.

Disclaimer

This blog is for information purposes only. The blog does not offer legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for proper legal advice. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of the individual authors and not of chambers as a whole. The editors reserve the right to edit or delete comments without notice. The editors bear no responsibility for any inaccuracies, errors, omissions, and statements in any blog posts or comments.

The International & Travel Law Blog editorial team and 12 King’s Bench Walk marketing team have access to any data submitted to the blog. This is a WordPress website: any information supplied by commentators, contributors, authors, editors and administrators is stored by WordPress. Data required by WordPress to allow for comment on our articles is stored by WordPress and only reviewed by the editors to prevent spam accounts. At any point the data subject can unsubscribe from the International & Travel Law Blog subscription service. An option to unsubscribe is included in every subscription email which automatically unsubscribes that email address. At any point, our editorial team reserve the right to unsubscribe or delete the data subject’s personal data without prior warning. The contact information for the 12 King’s Bench Walk Data Protection Officer may be found on the chambers website.

Tag: MIB

Moreno v MIB [2016] UKSC 52 – Applicable law, 4th Motor Insurance Directive, MIB