International & Travel Law Blog

This blog post is by James Beeton of 12 King’s Bench Walk. This interesting jurisdictional dispute involved an examination of the nature of a package tour operator’s duty of care – is the duty contractual or non-contractual? The answer to this question raised corresponding issues as to the applicability and effect of Rome I and II.

Disclaimer

This blog is for information purposes only. The blog does not offer legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for proper legal advice. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of the individual authors and not of chambers as a whole. The editors reserve the right to edit or delete comments without notice. The editors bear no responsibility for any inaccuracies, errors, omissions, and statements in any blog posts or comments.

The International & Travel Law Blog editorial team and 12 King’s Bench Walk marketing team have access to any data submitted to the blog. This is a WordPress website: any information supplied by commentators, contributors, authors, editors and administrators is stored by WordPress. Data required by WordPress to allow for comment on our articles is stored by WordPress and only reviewed by the editors to prevent spam accounts. At any point the data subject can unsubscribe from the International & Travel Law Blog subscription service. An option to unsubscribe is included in every subscription email which automatically unsubscribes that email address. At any point, our editorial team reserve the right to unsubscribe or delete the data subject’s personal data without prior warning. The contact information for the 12 King’s Bench Walk Data Protection Officer may be found on the chambers website.

International & Travel Law Blog

Committeri v (1) Club Mediterranée SA (2) Generali Assurances Iard SA [2016] EWHC 1510 (QB) – Package Travel Regulations, Jurisdiction, Rome I, Rome II

Message from the Editors